Visionary Apple approaches to Mac OS X: past, present and future


whilst topic begins focus on pre-release builds of yosemite (discussion), expect revisit after 10.10.x becomes outdated or legacy – i'm posting broader os x area.

----

my argument

yosemite, date, sense apple no longer has single, clear, shared vision os x.

there may multiple visionaries, , each personal vision may awesome, sum of visions – mash, if – lacks coherence , taste have become accustomed past releases of operating system.


thoughts , observations

mac os, mac os x, os x – operating systems mac hardware , (beneath surface) os x still mac os x:

code:
sh-3.2$ sw_vers  productname:	mac os x  productversion:	10.9.5  buildversion:	13f14
there's sense of constancy. appearances may change continue enjoy, in mavericks, many of features added either:
  • in mac os era; or
  • before mac os x became familiarly known os x.

many mac users, these features relevant years ago. if benefited using proxy icons in 1998, continue benefit in mavericks. , on.


visions

in parallel constancy: sense of using visionary operating system. product of the clear vision of 1 person, or vision without ownership clear , shared.


vision both clear , successful

apple's 2000 demonstration of single window mode. implementation criticised john siracusa (discussion) , others, vision great enough steve jobs make part of showcase world.

fourteen years later:
none of strikes me weird. it's not single window mode name, it's single window mode by nature, , it's not detrimental other modes of working. it's highly complementary.

that's excellent realisation, apple, of great , clear vision.


vision clear unsuccessful

first example comes mind: cocoa , death of yellow box , rhapsody


related

yosemite beautiful

yosemite looks terrible!

– please make appropriate use of topics, , others.


suggested guidelines discussion

in addition the customary rules, 3 guidelines.

respect – each other here, , apple people.

jobs famously described visionary, it's natural think of him in topic, should avoid speculation steve jobs might think now. speculation deceased touch nerves. r.i.p..

many other apple names, past , present, may come mind. treat these people if friends, or maybe in-laws. if disagree think person does, or did: aim base argument on software more on person.

confidentiality

if yosemite available public you're unsure legitimacy of thing becoming available, think twice before discussing thing.

relevance

os x on mac hardware.

have potential interaction different operatings systems on different hardware. if discuss ios here, please don't lose sight of focus: os x.

 

apple, past: getting things right

(i'll edit post, occasionally, add links , quote topics elsewhere.)

macintosh in 1984

 


Forums Macs macOS macOS


  • iPhone
  • Mac OS & System Software
  • iPad
  • Apple Watch
  • Notebooks
  • iTunes
  • Apple ID
  • iCloud
  • Desktop Computers
  • Apple Music
  • Professional Applications
  • iPod
  • iWork
  • Apple TV
  • iLife
  • Wireless

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Carrier post Error specific

How to increase vRAM for HD3000 graphics

Carrier [Information] AT&T NEXT